Monday, December 9, 2013

The lack of empathy with Iraqis as human beings marks white American males as a collective danger t


The Phony Pullout from Afghanistan carpet cleaning machines Extractive World Order: Plundering Planet Earth, carpet cleaning machines Seizing Resources and Erasing Cultures 9/11 Truth: How to Debunk WTC Thermite at Ground Zero The Global Money Matrix: The Forces behind America s Economic Destruction The Geneva Agreement with Iran: A Result of the Sanctions Policy? Iran-US Interim Agreement: Historic Breakthrough or Historic Sellout?
During President Obama s run-up to war with Syria, African Americans were, for the first time in polling history, the most bellicose major ethnicity in the United States. How could such a political role-reversal come to pass? The progressive, peace-seeking African American worldview is out of sync with the deep imperative to support the First Black President.
Barack carpet cleaning machines Obama has proven to be a warmongering thug for global capital, carpet cleaning machines many times over. The question is: Have African Americans, his most loyal supporters, joined the bi-partisan War Party, rejecting the historical Black consensus on social justice and peace (or, at least, the peace part)?
Ever since national pollsters began tracking African American public opinion, surveys have shown Blacks to be consistently clustered at the left side of the national political spectrum. More than any other ethnicity, carpet cleaning machines African Americans have opposed U.S. military adventures abroad, by wide margins. Indeed, the sheer size of the blood lust gap between the races indicates that the Black international worldview differs quite radically from white Americans and, to a lesser but marked degree, from Hispanics.
A Washington Post/ABC poll conducted between August 28 and September 1 showed 40 percent of African Americans supported President Obama s threats of airstrikes against carpet cleaning machines Syria two points more than whites and nine percent more than Hispanics. Majorities of all three groups opposed bombing Syria 56 percent of Blacks, 58 percent of whites and 63 percent of Hispanics but African Americans were, for the first time in polling history, the most bellicose major ethnicity in the United States.
A Pew Research poll from the same period showed Blacks somewhat less supportive of airstrikes, with only 22 percent of African Americans and 29 percent carpet cleaning machines of whites in favor. Fifty-three percent of Blacks and 47 percent of whites were opposed (Hispanic data were not made available.) However, about one-quarter of both Blacks and whites were allowed to choose undecided in the Pew survey, without which option the results would likely have been more in line with the Washington Post/ABC poll, with large numbers of Blacks aligning themselves with Obama.
There is no doubt that this apparent decline in Black aversion to U.S. foreign aggressions has everything to do with the color (and party) of the commander-in-chief. For all the right historical reasons, African Americans have always been highly skeptical of U.S. motives abroad. With Obama nominally in charge, such righteous Black skepticism of American (meaning, white) motives is less operative.
Only ten years ago, a Zogby poll revealed the vast chasm that existed between Blacks and the two other major ethnic groups on issues of war and peace. The Black Commentator for February carpet cleaning machines 13, 2003 , reported:
An Atlanta Journal-Constitution/Zogby America poll released this past weekend shows that less than a quarter of Blacks (23 percent) support Bush’s war against Iraq, versus 62 percent of the white public. 64 percent of Blacks surveyed somewhat or strongly oppose” the planned attack, while 13 percent aren’t sure what to think.
The bloodthirstiness of white American males is astounding: 68 percent of men surveyed are gung ho, indicating that the white male pro-war cohort carpet cleaning machines soars somewhere in the high seventies. Less than half of all women favor war.
The lack of empathy with Iraqis as human beings marks white American males as a collective danger to the species. Zogby pollsters asked: Would you support or oppose a war against Iraq if it meant thousands of Iraqi civilian casualties? A solid majority of white men answered in the affirmative, as did more than a third of white women. Only seven percent of African Americans favored a war that would kill thousands.
The carpet cleaning machines fact that only a marginal proportion of Blacks (7 percent) favored an invasion in which thousands of Iraqi civilians would die less than half the proportion of Hispanics and a small fraction of white belligerents of both sexes speaks to African Americans relatively deep empathy for other peoples as well as their disdain for U.S. militarism. It is central to the African American political-cultural legacy.
In the decade since the Iraq invasion, the general American populace has grown more wary of Washington s wars in the Mideast. Why, then, would the least militaristic ethnic group suddenly become relatively more warlike than whites? Have Black Americans undergone some accelerated ideological mutation carpet cleaning machines in the interve

No comments:

Post a Comment